CASE REPORT  
Niger J Paed 2014; 41 (2): 151 –153  
Bello M  
Frontonasal dysplasia Sequence : A  
case report  
Garandawa H  
Mustapha Z  
Isa A  
Tahir C  
Ngamdu YB  
Machoko Y  
Abubakar H  
Djossi SK  
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njp.v41i2,17  
Accepted: 3rd January 2014  
Abstract Frontonasal dysplasia  
FND) is a very rare congenital  
abnormality in which the mid face  
does not develop normally. It  
affects mainly the head and face.  
Cause is unknown but may be  
sporadic or familial. We report a  
rare case of a full term baby who  
presented with classical features of  
FND in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Man-  
agement difficulty in resource  
(
(
)
Bello M  
Machoko Y, Abubakar H, Djossi SK  
Department of Pediatrics,  
limited setting is highlighted.  
Key words: Dysmorphism, Fronto-  
nasal dysplasia, Neonate.  
Garandawa H, Isa A, Ngamdu YB  
Department of ENT Surgery,  
Mustapha Z  
Department of Radiology,  
Tahir C  
Burns and Plastic Unit,  
Department of Surgery,  
University of Maiduguri Teaching  
Hospital.  
Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria  
Introduction  
which she had paracetamol and B-complex given orally.  
No significant history of ingndestion of herbal prepara-  
tions. The patient was the 2 child in a monogamous  
setting; mother is unemployed while the father was a  
security officer. No history of similar features in the  
other sib. Examination at presentation revealed length of  
50cm, occipito-frontal circumference of 33cm and  
weight of 3.05kg. The baby has obvious facial deformity  
(Fig 1), widow’s peak and cranium bifidum occultum on  
forehead, in respiratory distress, with divided nostrils,  
bifid nose and serous discharge with low set ears.  
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) sequence also called me-  
dian cleft face syndrome is a rare condition in which the  
face does not develop normally with only, 2a few reported  
1
cases worldwide and none from Nigeria . The cause of  
this disorder is unknown, with a sporadic occurrence, it  
may occasionally be familial . FND affects the head and  
face mainly but occasional abnormalities are found in  
the eyes, the brain and heart . We report here a case of  
FND with agenesis of Corpus callosum, a usual finding  
in this disorder.  
3
4
Fig 1: Showing facial  
deformity, low set ears with de-  
formity of the nose and widow’s  
peak  
Case Report  
Six hours old, term male neonate was brought into the  
Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) of the University of  
Maiduguri Teaching Hospital on account of dysmorphic  
facie. Baby was delivered to a 27 year old Para 2 woman  
through spontaneous vertex delivery at home assisted by  
traditional birth attendant. Parents were not consan-  
guineously married. Mother had antenatal care at a pri-  
mary health care facility, registered at two months gesta-  
tion. She was said to have had fever during the first  
month of gestation associated with abdominal pain for  
Fig 2: Showing: Widow’s Peak,  
deformed nose with widely  
spaced eyes and serous discharge  
from the nostrils  
1
52  
Investigati9ons done reveals: FBC – PCV = 50%, WBC =  
.8 x 10 /L, N=58%, L=34%, E=4%, M=4%, Blood  
quently extended these observations and recommended  
frontonasal dy1splasia as a more appropriate designation  
for this defect.  
7
Culture – No growth. CT-Scan: The 3D reformation  
shows absent nasal bones with hypoplasia and lack of  
midline fusion of the frontal bones which were deficient  
bilaterally. Corpus callosum agenesis is noted. The cere-  
bral and cerebellar cortices are normal. The right ante-  
rior horn of the lateral ventricle appears slightly nar-  
rowed? Positional, the brain stem is normal; features are  
in keeping with medium cleft face syndrome (Fig. 3)  
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare developmental  
defect of craniofac1i, a2,l4region where the midface does not  
develop normally  
. The exact cause of FND is un-  
known. Anomalies can be explained by single malfor-  
mation, though most cases are sporadic. It has also been  
suggested that a defect involving chromosomes 3q23,  
2 3  
q27, 7q21 and 11q21 might play a role , . In our case,  
3
Fig 3: CT Brain – 3 D  
Reformated image  
showing sutural diastesis  
and defect in frontal  
bone  
chromosomal studies were not done due to absence of  
facilities. The parents of an affec5t,e6d child can expect the  
risk to be 25% for the next child.  
The embryogenic origin of FND is in the period prior trod  
the 28 – mm crown rump length stages. During the 3  
week of gestation, two areas of thickened ectoderm, the  
olfactory areas appear immediately under the forebrain  
in the anterior wall of the stomodeum. By the up –  
growth of the surrounding parts, these areas are con-  
verted into pits, the olfactory pits, which indent the fron-  
tonasal prominence and divide into a medial and two  
lateral nasal processes. Frontonasal dysplasia is due to  
deficient remodeling of the nasal capsule, which causes  
the future fronto-naso-ethmoidal complex to freeze in  
Fig 4: CT Brain –  
sagittal image show-  
ing agenesis of corpus  
callosum  
3
the fetal form .  
There may be few defects in the milder form of FND  
where as the severe defects affects the eyes  
Fig 5: CT Brain – Axial  
Image – showing absence of  
frontal horn of lateral ven-  
tricles  
(
hypertelorism, lateral displacement), forehead (widow’s  
peak, deficit in midline frontal bone – cranium bifidum  
occultum), and the nose – (variably affected from  
notched broad nasal tip to completely divided nostrils  
with hypoplasia to absence of t7h,e8 prolabium and pre-  
maxilla with a median cleft lip) - as was the case in  
our patient. Our patient did not however have some fea-  
tures such as absence of prolabium and pre-maxilla and  
median cleft.  
As neonates are nasal breathers, simultaneous sucking  
9
and breathing leads to respiratory distress . This was the  
case in our patient at the time they presented to us. Oral  
airway and orogastric feeding was instituted temporar-  
ily, canalization of the nasal passage was planned for to  
allow breastfeeding and breathing with cosmetic surgery  
planned for a later time but parents refused and took  
baby home against medical advice as reported in other  
Baby had an oropharyngeal airway was put in place and  
nasogastric tube size 6 FR passed for feeding with ex-  
pressed breastmilk. Problems encountered were: nasal  
cavity not patent posteriorly and respiratory difficulty on  
removal of oropharyngeal airway. Baby was planned for  
an initial posterior choanoraphy so as to enable nasal  
breathing without interfering with feeding and later cos-  
metic surgery, but baby’s parents refused medical advice  
and took baby home against medical advice at the age of  
9
series . Despite efforts at getting the hospital to waive  
charges off for admission and surgery, the parents de-  
cline staying in hospital for further medical management  
on grounds of father going on posting outside the coun-  
try. Further follow-up was also not possible in this in-  
stance as both mother and baby travel out of Maiduguri  
to their home town immediately after discharge.  
1
8 days.  
Individuals with FND tend to have normal lifespan with  
average intelligence. Affected individuals with severe  
form of the disorder may die shortly after birth if correc-  
tive surgery to establish normal feeding and breathing is  
not performed as soon as possible.  
Discussion  
DeMeyer first described the transitional gradations in  
severity of this presumed single primary localized defect  
in 33 cases and called this pattern of anomaly the me-  
1
dian cleft face syndrome . Sedano and colleaques subse-  
1
53  
Conclusion  
problem in our own setting. We suggest making services  
available free of charge to under fives and particularly  
the newborn, this will have helped in prompt and effec-  
tive management of such babies, thereby reducing  
neonatal morbidity and mortality.  
In conclusion, FND is a very rare disorder; the aetiology  
is unknown and may require a multidisciplinary man-  
agement approach. Lack of adequate diagnostic facili-  
ties, Socio-economic and cultural factors may be a  
References  
1
.
Jones KL. “Frontonasal Dysplasia  
Sequence” In Smith’s Recogniz-  
able Pattern of Human Malforma-  
tion, sixth Edition, Elsevier  
Saunders, 2006; 268-269.  
4.  
Handbook of Genetic Counsel-  
ing/Frontonasal Dysplasia-  
Median Cleft Face Syndrome.  
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/  
Hand-  
7.  
Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, and Levin  
SL. “Syndromes with Unusual  
Facies.” Syndromes of the Head  
and Neck. Oxford University  
Press (1990): 785-788  
2
3
.
.
Seema Sharma, Vipin Sharma,  
Meenakshi Bothra. Frontonasal  
dysplasia. J Neurosc Rural Pract  
book_of_Genetic_Counselling/  
Frontonasal Dysplasia-Median  
Cleft Face Syndrome.  
5. Fox JW, Golden GT, Edgerton  
MT. Frontonasal dysplasia with  
alar clefts in two sisters. Genetic  
considerations and surgical correc-  
tion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;  
8. Apere H, Serville F, Collet B, Bil-  
leaud C, Sandler B. Frontonasal  
dysplasia or the median cleft face  
syndrome: a case report. J Genet  
Hum. 1989; 37(4-5):431-6.  
2
012; 3:65-67.  
Median Facial Cleft Syndrome.  
http://www.mypacs.net/cases/  
median-facial-cleft-syndrome  
9.  
Debabrata Das, Gobinda Das,  
Sibnath Gayen, Arpita Konar.  
Median facial cleft in amniotic  
band syndrome. Meajo, 2011, 18:  
192-194.  
5
7:553-6  
6
.
Lorenz P, Prager B, Tellkamp H.  
Frontonasal dysplasia: Case report  
and review of literature. Kinder-  
arzt Prax 1990; 58:415-20